Why does peta support bsl

Photo credit: Central California Pets Alive. This news shocks and outrages the compassionate dog-lover. PETA even supported the pit bull ban in Ontario, Canada, which mandates the pound seizure of animals from shelters by companies who use them for animal experimentation—the fate that ostensibly awaited some of the family pets seized under the PETA-supported breed ban.

PETA also practices what it preaches. What's the kindest thing we can ALL do to help pit bulls? For them? The blog piece goes on to claim that PETA advocates the protection of Pit Bulls from being used in dogfights, being abused by breeders, and turned into cheap security systems. The way to do this, PETA claims, is through breed-specific legislation, the very solution that is not only rejected but actively opposed by every reputable animal rights organization in the world.

DearPETA screw you. Its case is primarily made not through facts, but through hideous, gut-churning photographs of dogs who have been abused, starved, and mutilated by humans. It can only be made through half-truths and hideous pictures of abuse designed to strike at the emotions. Pit Bulls, organizers say, are inherently vicious — not because of human cruelty or fear, but because that viciousness is bred in the bone.

The only solution is to eliminate the breed by sterilizing the ones alive now and banning the breeding of any younger ones. It is filled from beginning to end with stories and statistics that seem to show that Pit Bulls are bloodthirsty beasts who are just hungering to rip out your organs — or those of your children.

If you read it as fact, there is no way you would ever take home a Pit from the shelter. Any Pit Bull living in a shelter would eventually die there. PETA is only increasing the misery of animals, not only through sponsoring this event, but by its long-term support of breed-specific legislation.

Why am I writing this post? PETA has also openly lied, trying to justify the large number of animals they euthanize. Of course, the killing of puppies and kittens strongly betrays that, as does the more extreme case of Maya. The methods of PETA are often unethical, resorting to trolls and active sabotage — even if it means targeting other animal rights groups. Smear campaigns seem to often be the norm.

Speaking to The Guardian, Newkirk commented that she hopes the foot-and-mouth disease, which forced farmers to kill millions of animals, would spread to the US. For an organization which claims to be all about reducing animal suffering, wishing a devastating disease on an animal population raises a lot of question marks.

For the more moderate side of the organization, this is simply an exercise of raising awareness. But for the more extreme members, things are taken quite literally. PETA started out by helping launch the first police investigation into animal cruelty in research facilities. It was a much-needed conversation that society needed to have.

The Silver Spring Monkeys, as the case came to be called, made headlines. No doubt, PETA has done significant good in their activity. Their investigations were, at times, true milestones for animal rights awareness. Over the time this article was written, we also uncovered several smear campaigns directed against PETA itself and several baseless allegations have been made against the organization. PETA does not routinely kidnap pets nor is it a terrorist organization, and it has been attacked by astroturf organizations from the junk food industry.

However, this does not justify unethical, inhumane, and often baseless behavior. PETA is a very influential organization — but they are also one of the most extreme ones. They thrive from notoriety and shock and show surprisingly few projects directly helping animals. For all its talk, PETA seems more enamored with seeing itself on the news than actually helping animals.

PETA tries to elicit emotions and brute force a societal change — but while they are effective at raising awareness, these methods can also be very counter-productive. After all, notoriety can only get you so far; when you shed your morals, results cannot truly be on the positive side. For better or for worse, PETA does not represent the mainstream approach and practice to protecting animal rights, nor does it have a science-based position.

Often times, PETA seems more like a religious cult than an animal rights organization. Also, PETA has fallen to the dark side more than a couple of times. They have shown that they are willing to throw anything — and anyone — under the bus to achieve their goals. Despite its undeniable contribution to animal rights awareness, PETA has a surprising number of skeletons in its closet, and it seems proud of those skeletons. From killing healthy pets to save them of suffering to supporting eco-terrorism and misleading, unscientific campaigns, PETA is shrouded in a dark cloud of systematic controversy.

Andrei's background is in geophysics, and he's been fascinated by it ever since he was a child. Feeling that there is a gap between scientists and the general audience, he started ZME Science -- and the results are what you see today.

News U. Politics Joe Biden Congress Extremism. Special Projects Highline. HuffPost Personal Video Horoscopes. Follow Us. Terms Privacy Policy. We're not talking about dogs who have done anything wrong.

This concerns all pit bulls. Shame on you PETA. And now, the dogs have the floor -- don't worry; they're housetrained:. That is called a contradiction. Well, my adopted mom does a great job of keeping me safe and happy and comfortable.